In this paper I deal with the question of the link between concept and inconceivable, namely nothing but philosophy and poetry. These are not mere "human activities" or "subjects", but the double <> of the destiny of human being. The constitution of this being is not founded upon necessity. On the contrary, necessity is possible only if we can think something that we could called <> (symbebekòs, accidens), that is not the same of what philosophical and scientific tradition - from Aristotle until nowadays - have described. I attempt to explain this metaphysical theory thanks to an <> that connects Leopardi, Hegel and Aristotle.
Prossimità accidentale
Andrea Raciti
2022-01-01
Abstract
In this paper I deal with the question of the link between concept and inconceivable, namely nothing but philosophy and poetry. These are not mere "human activities" or "subjects", but the double <> of the destiny of human being. The constitution of this being is not founded upon necessity. On the contrary, necessity is possible only if we can think something that we could called <> (symbebekòs, accidens), that is not the same of what philosophical and scientific tradition - from Aristotle until nowadays - have described. I attempt to explain this metaphysical theory thanks to an <> that connects Leopardi, Hegel and Aristotle.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
