: This study assessed a new smartphone-based digital stethoscope (DS) featuring simultaneous phonocardiographic and one-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) recording in dogs and cats. The audio files and ECG traces obtained by the device were compared with conventional auscultation and standard ECG. A total of 99 dogs and nine cats were prospectively included. All cases underwent conventional auscultation using an acoustic stethoscope, standard six-lead ECG, standard echocardiography and recordings with the DS. All the audio recordings, phonocardiographic files and ECG traces were then blind reviewed by an expert operator. The agreement between methods was assessed using Cohen's kappa and the Bland-Altman test. Audio recordings were considered interpretable in 90% animals. Substantial agreement was found in the diagnosis of heart murmur (κ = 0.691) and gallop sound (k = 0.740). In nine animals with an echocardiographic diagnosis of heart disease, only the DS detected a heart murmur or gallop sound. ECG traces recorded with the new device were deemed interpretable in 88 % animals. Diagnosis of heart rhythm showed moderate agreement in the identification of atrial fibrillation (k = 0.596). The detection of ventricular premature complexes and bundle branch blocks revealed an almost perfect agreement (k = 1). Overall, the DS showed a good diagnostic accuracy in detecting heart murmurs, gallop sounds, ventricular premature complexes and bundle branch blocks. A clinically relevant overdiagnosis of atrial fibrillation was found but without evidence of false negatives. The DS could represent a useful screening tool for heart sound abnormalities and cardiac arrhythmias..

Evaluation of a new smartphone-based digital stethoscope featuring phonocardiography and electrocardiography in dogs and cats

Vezzosi, T
Primo
;
Alibrandi, L
Secondo
;
Grosso, G
Penultimo
;
Tognetti, R
Ultimo
2023-01-01

Abstract

: This study assessed a new smartphone-based digital stethoscope (DS) featuring simultaneous phonocardiographic and one-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) recording in dogs and cats. The audio files and ECG traces obtained by the device were compared with conventional auscultation and standard ECG. A total of 99 dogs and nine cats were prospectively included. All cases underwent conventional auscultation using an acoustic stethoscope, standard six-lead ECG, standard echocardiography and recordings with the DS. All the audio recordings, phonocardiographic files and ECG traces were then blind reviewed by an expert operator. The agreement between methods was assessed using Cohen's kappa and the Bland-Altman test. Audio recordings were considered interpretable in 90% animals. Substantial agreement was found in the diagnosis of heart murmur (κ = 0.691) and gallop sound (k = 0.740). In nine animals with an echocardiographic diagnosis of heart disease, only the DS detected a heart murmur or gallop sound. ECG traces recorded with the new device were deemed interpretable in 88 % animals. Diagnosis of heart rhythm showed moderate agreement in the identification of atrial fibrillation (k = 0.596). The detection of ventricular premature complexes and bundle branch blocks revealed an almost perfect agreement (k = 1). Overall, the DS showed a good diagnostic accuracy in detecting heart murmurs, gallop sounds, ventricular premature complexes and bundle branch blocks. A clinically relevant overdiagnosis of atrial fibrillation was found but without evidence of false negatives. The DS could represent a useful screening tool for heart sound abnormalities and cardiac arrhythmias..
2023
Vezzosi, T; Alibrandi, L; Grosso, G; Tognetti, R
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1183427
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact