Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine myocardial performance using pressure-strain loops in hypertensive patients with different level of blood pressure control. Material and methods: This cross-sectional study included 204 subjects (45 controls, 70 patients with well-controlled hypertension, 58 patients with uncontrolled hypertension and 31 patients with resistant hypertension) who underwent complete two-dimensional echocardiographic examination including two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. Pressure-strain curve was used to determine global myocardial work, constructive work, wasted work and work efficiency in all study participants. Results: Left ventricular (LV) longitudinal strain gradually reduced from controls throughout well-controlled hypertensive patients, to patients with uncontrolled and resistant hypertension. Global myocardial work was higher in patients with uncontrolled and resistant hypertension than in controls and well-controlled hypertension. Constructive work was also higher in all hypertensive patients than in controls. Global wasted work and work efficiency were similar between different groups. Global myocardial work index was associated with peak oxygen consumption independently of sex, age, body mass index (BMI), LV structural and functional parameters in all hypertensive participants. Conclusions: Myocardial work was significantly deteriorated in patients with uncontrolled and resistant arterial hypertension compared to controls and well-controlled hypertensive patients. Global myocardial work was associated with functional capacity independent of clinical and echocardiographic parameters.

Association between myocardial work and functional capacity in patients with arterial hypertension: an echocardiographic study

Stefano Taddei
Validation
;
Guido Grassi
Validation
;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine myocardial performance using pressure-strain loops in hypertensive patients with different level of blood pressure control. Material and methods: This cross-sectional study included 204 subjects (45 controls, 70 patients with well-controlled hypertension, 58 patients with uncontrolled hypertension and 31 patients with resistant hypertension) who underwent complete two-dimensional echocardiographic examination including two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. Pressure-strain curve was used to determine global myocardial work, constructive work, wasted work and work efficiency in all study participants. Results: Left ventricular (LV) longitudinal strain gradually reduced from controls throughout well-controlled hypertensive patients, to patients with uncontrolled and resistant hypertension. Global myocardial work was higher in patients with uncontrolled and resistant hypertension than in controls and well-controlled hypertension. Constructive work was also higher in all hypertensive patients than in controls. Global wasted work and work efficiency were similar between different groups. Global myocardial work index was associated with peak oxygen consumption independently of sex, age, body mass index (BMI), LV structural and functional parameters in all hypertensive participants. Conclusions: Myocardial work was significantly deteriorated in patients with uncontrolled and resistant arterial hypertension compared to controls and well-controlled hypertensive patients. Global myocardial work was associated with functional capacity independent of clinical and echocardiographic parameters.
2021
Tadic, Marijana; Cuspidi, Cesare; Pencic, Biljana; Vukomanovic, Vladan; Taddei, Stefano; Grassi, Guido; Celic, Vera
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1289731
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact