Two key steps in addressing the vaccination hesitancy issue are assessing the population's attitudes toward vaccination and making measures' availability as broad as possible (not limited to English-speaking populations). To reach the latter goal, we adapted the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) Scale to the Italian context. This scale has the advantages of not being vaccine-specific and of measuring individual attitudes rather than parental vaccination decisions, making it a widely adopted tool. Our scale exhibited the same desirable psychometric properties as the original version. Our investigation involved a sample of N=479 respondents showing the measurement's internal consistency and confirming the original factorial structure. Moreover, we confirmed the scale's high criterion-related validity linking greater anti-vaccination scores to previous vaccination behaviors, and we confirmed measurement invariance by running a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis comparing our current data with existing data. Additionally, we explored the scale's capabilities by linking the measure to the endorsement of infection-spreading countermeasures, a useful insight for behavioral scientists and policy-makers.
Psychometric Assessment of the Italian Version of the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) Scale and Exploration of Its Link With Policy Endorsement
Marco Biella;Angelo GemignaniSecondo
;Ciro Conversano;Mario Miniati;Graziella Orrù
Ultimo
2025-01-01
Abstract
Two key steps in addressing the vaccination hesitancy issue are assessing the population's attitudes toward vaccination and making measures' availability as broad as possible (not limited to English-speaking populations). To reach the latter goal, we adapted the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) Scale to the Italian context. This scale has the advantages of not being vaccine-specific and of measuring individual attitudes rather than parental vaccination decisions, making it a widely adopted tool. Our scale exhibited the same desirable psychometric properties as the original version. Our investigation involved a sample of N=479 respondents showing the measurement's internal consistency and confirming the original factorial structure. Moreover, we confirmed the scale's high criterion-related validity linking greater anti-vaccination scores to previous vaccination behaviors, and we confirmed measurement invariance by running a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis comparing our current data with existing data. Additionally, we explored the scale's capabilities by linking the measure to the endorsement of infection-spreading countermeasures, a useful insight for behavioral scientists and policy-makers.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


