A completely automated system for the identification of pleural nodules in low-dose and thin-slice computed tomography (Cr) of the lung has been developed. The directional-gradient concentration method has been applied to the pleura surface and combined with a morphological opening-based procedure to generate a list of nodule candidates. Each nodule candidate is characterized by 12 morphological and textural features, which are analyzed by a rule-based filter and a neural classifier. This detection system has been developed and validated on a clataset of 42 annotated CT scans. The k-fold cross validation has been used to evaluate the neural classifier performance. The system performance variability due to different ground truth agreement levels is discussed. In particular, the poor 44% sensitivity obtained on the ground truth with agreement level I (nodules annotated by only one radiologist) with six FP per scan grows up to the 72% if the underlying ground truth is changed to the agreement level 2 (nodules annotated by two radiologists). (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Pleural nodule identification in low-dose and thin-slice lung computed tomography

FANTACCI, MARIA EVELINA;
2009-01-01

Abstract

A completely automated system for the identification of pleural nodules in low-dose and thin-slice computed tomography (Cr) of the lung has been developed. The directional-gradient concentration method has been applied to the pleura surface and combined with a morphological opening-based procedure to generate a list of nodule candidates. Each nodule candidate is characterized by 12 morphological and textural features, which are analyzed by a rule-based filter and a neural classifier. This detection system has been developed and validated on a clataset of 42 annotated CT scans. The k-fold cross validation has been used to evaluate the neural classifier performance. The system performance variability due to different ground truth agreement levels is discussed. In particular, the poor 44% sensitivity obtained on the ground truth with agreement level I (nodules annotated by only one radiologist) with six FP per scan grows up to the 72% if the underlying ground truth is changed to the agreement level 2 (nodules annotated by two radiologists). (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
2009
Retico, A; Fantacci, MARIA EVELINA; Gori, I; Kasae, P; Golosio, B; Piccioli, A; Cerello, P; De Nunzio, G; Tangaro, S.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/132105
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 45
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 35
social impact