Total mastectomy causes considerable tissue damage and a marked perioperative pain response. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of epidural administration of 0.5% ropivacaine on pain management for mastectomy in dogs. Twenty client-owned dogs were enrolled and divided in 2 groups: Epi-group (received a single dose of 0.5% ropicavaine epidurally) and Mor-group (received morphine IM). All dogs were premedicated with 0.3 mg kg 1 of morphine IM, anaesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol infusions. The volume of ropivacaine was calculated with a specific nomogram (Otero et al, 2010). Records of HR, fR, MAP, PE’CO2 and SpO2 were taken before and after epidural administration and throughout surgery. On recovery, dogs received 2 mg kg 1 of robenacoxib SC and were evaluated for pain score every hour, for 20 hours, using the Glasgow short form pain scale. Intraoperative rescue analgesia with fentanyl 2 lg kg 1 was administered if HR and MAP increased over 20% from previous values. Postoperative rescue analgesia (morphine 0.3 mg kg 1 IM) was administered with pain score higher than 5. Data were analysed with ANOVA tests and Tukey post hoc was used to evaluate data all over the time; a Friedmann test was used to compare pain scores. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant. No differences were detected between groups for age, weight and surgery time. All the dogs of Mor-group and three dogs in Epi-group required intraoperative fentanyl. Postoperative pain score was significantly higher in Mor-group (p = 0.03) and the morphine requirement, over 20 hours, was significantly higher (p = 0.004) for Mor-group (1.4 0.43 mg kg 1) compared to Epi-group (0.76 0.42 mg kg 1). Epidural administration of ropivacaine 0.5% was a good analgesic option and the nomogram to calculate the injected volume appeared satisfactory for this procedure.

Perioperative analgesic effect of epidural ropivacaine 0.5% in dogs undergoing total monolateral mastectomy

BRIGANTI, ANGELA;BREGHI, GLORIA
2013-01-01

Abstract

Total mastectomy causes considerable tissue damage and a marked perioperative pain response. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of epidural administration of 0.5% ropivacaine on pain management for mastectomy in dogs. Twenty client-owned dogs were enrolled and divided in 2 groups: Epi-group (received a single dose of 0.5% ropicavaine epidurally) and Mor-group (received morphine IM). All dogs were premedicated with 0.3 mg kg 1 of morphine IM, anaesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol infusions. The volume of ropivacaine was calculated with a specific nomogram (Otero et al, 2010). Records of HR, fR, MAP, PE’CO2 and SpO2 were taken before and after epidural administration and throughout surgery. On recovery, dogs received 2 mg kg 1 of robenacoxib SC and were evaluated for pain score every hour, for 20 hours, using the Glasgow short form pain scale. Intraoperative rescue analgesia with fentanyl 2 lg kg 1 was administered if HR and MAP increased over 20% from previous values. Postoperative rescue analgesia (morphine 0.3 mg kg 1 IM) was administered with pain score higher than 5. Data were analysed with ANOVA tests and Tukey post hoc was used to evaluate data all over the time; a Friedmann test was used to compare pain scores. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant. No differences were detected between groups for age, weight and surgery time. All the dogs of Mor-group and three dogs in Epi-group required intraoperative fentanyl. Postoperative pain score was significantly higher in Mor-group (p = 0.03) and the morphine requirement, over 20 hours, was significantly higher (p = 0.004) for Mor-group (1.4 0.43 mg kg 1) compared to Epi-group (0.76 0.42 mg kg 1). Epidural administration of ropivacaine 0.5% was a good analgesic option and the nomogram to calculate the injected volume appeared satisfactory for this procedure.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/237530
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact