The offset between the hole and the centre of the strain-gage rosette is unavoidable, although usually small, in the hole-drilling technique for residual stress evaluation. In this article, we revised the integral method described in the ASTM E837 standard and we recalculated the calibration coefficients. The integral method was then extended by taking into account the two eccentricity components, and a more general procedure was proposed including the first-order correction. A numerical validation analysis was used to consolidate the procedure and evaluate the residual error after implementing the correction. The values of this error resulted limited to a few percentage points, even for eccentricities larger than the usual experimental values. The narrow eccentricity limit claimed by the standard, to keep the maximum error lower than 10%, can now be considered extended by approximately a factor of 10, after implementing the proposed correcting procedure, proving that the effect of the eccentricity is mainly linear within a relatively large range.

First-order correction to counter the effect of eccentricity on the hole-drilling integral method with strain-gage rosettes

M. Barsanti;M. Beghini;L. Bertini;B. D. Monelli;C. Santus
2016-01-01

Abstract

The offset between the hole and the centre of the strain-gage rosette is unavoidable, although usually small, in the hole-drilling technique for residual stress evaluation. In this article, we revised the integral method described in the ASTM E837 standard and we recalculated the calibration coefficients. The integral method was then extended by taking into account the two eccentricity components, and a more general procedure was proposed including the first-order correction. A numerical validation analysis was used to consolidate the procedure and evaluate the residual error after implementing the correction. The values of this error resulted limited to a few percentage points, even for eccentricities larger than the usual experimental values. The narrow eccentricity limit claimed by the standard, to keep the maximum error lower than 10%, can now be considered extended by approximately a factor of 10, after implementing the proposed correcting procedure, proving that the effect of the eccentricity is mainly linear within a relatively large range.
2016
Barsanti, M.; Beghini, M.; Bertini, L.; Monelli, B. D.; Santus, C.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design 2016, 2016, 51(6) 431-443.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione finale editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 4.55 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.55 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
suppl-appendix.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Appendice online
Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 162.94 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
162.94 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/804420
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 15
social impact