With our new home-built circularly polarized luminescence (CPL) instrument, we measured fluorescence and CPL spectra of the enantiomeric pairs of two quasi-isomeric BODIPY DYEmers 1 and 2, endowed with axial chirality. The electronic circular dichroism (ECD) and CPL spectra of these atropisomeric dimers are dominated by the exciton coupling between the main π–π* transitions (550–560 nm) of the two BODIPY rings. Compound 1 has strong ECD and CPL spectra (glum=4×10−3) well reproduced by TD-DFT and SCS-CC2 (spin-component scaled second-order approximate coupled-cluster) calculations using DFT-optimized ground- and excited-state structures. Compound 2 has weaker ECD and CPL spectra (glum=4×10−4), partly due to the mutual cancellation of electric–electric and electric–magnetic exciton couplings, and partly to its conformational freedom. This compound is computationally very challenging. Starting from the optimized excited-state geometries, we predicted the wrong sign for the CPL band of 2 using TD-DFT with the most recommended hybrid and range-separated functionals, whereas SCS-CC2 or a DFT functional with full exact exchange provided the correct sign.
Circularly Polarized Luminescence from Axially Chiral BODIPY DYEmers: An Experimental and Computational Study
ZINNA, FRANCESCO;GUIDO, Ciro Achille;DI BARI, LORENZO;PESCITELLI, GENNARO
Ultimo
2016-01-01
Abstract
With our new home-built circularly polarized luminescence (CPL) instrument, we measured fluorescence and CPL spectra of the enantiomeric pairs of two quasi-isomeric BODIPY DYEmers 1 and 2, endowed with axial chirality. The electronic circular dichroism (ECD) and CPL spectra of these atropisomeric dimers are dominated by the exciton coupling between the main π–π* transitions (550–560 nm) of the two BODIPY rings. Compound 1 has strong ECD and CPL spectra (glum=4×10−3) well reproduced by TD-DFT and SCS-CC2 (spin-component scaled second-order approximate coupled-cluster) calculations using DFT-optimized ground- and excited-state structures. Compound 2 has weaker ECD and CPL spectra (glum=4×10−4), partly due to the mutual cancellation of electric–electric and electric–magnetic exciton couplings, and partly to its conformational freedom. This compound is computationally very challenging. Starting from the optimized excited-state geometries, we predicted the wrong sign for the CPL band of 2 using TD-DFT with the most recommended hybrid and range-separated functionals, whereas SCS-CC2 or a DFT functional with full exact exchange provided the correct sign.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
BODIPY_CEJ_2016_postprint.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
884.45 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
884.45 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
chem.201602684.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Versione finale editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
1.24 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.24 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.