Soft constraint formalisms are an abstract representation of Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs): the set of preferences is now parametric, often forming (a variety of) an absorptive semiring. However, the latter is suitable only for negative preferences, i.e., such that the combination of constraints worsens the quality of the solution. This work comments on related work and exploits residuated semirings in order to lift the Local Consistency heuristics that hold for classical CSPs. As a result, we merge and generalise existent formalisms for modelling soft CSPs with bipolar (positive and negative) preferences.

Residuation for bipolar preferences in soft constraints

GADDUCCI, FABIO;
2017-01-01

Abstract

Soft constraint formalisms are an abstract representation of Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs): the set of preferences is now parametric, often forming (a variety of) an absorptive semiring. However, the latter is suitable only for negative preferences, i.e., such that the combination of constraints worsens the quality of the solution. This work comments on related work and exploits residuated semirings in order to lift the Local Consistency heuristics that hold for classical CSPs. As a result, we merge and generalise existent formalisms for modelling soft CSPs with bipolar (positive and negative) preferences.
2017
Gadducci, Fabio; Santini, Francesco
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ipl118.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione finale editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 327.79 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
327.79 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Revised Manuscript.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 134.78 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
134.78 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/817523
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact