Described here is a new method for determination of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) based on arterial diameter waveform recording by an ultrasound system. The study was carried out on 120 consecutive patients. Carotid-femoral PWV was determined using a tonometric technique (PWVpp, PulsePen, DiaTecne, Milan, Italy) and an echotracking ultrasound system (PWVet, E-Track, Aloka, Tokyo, Japan). The relationship between PWVpp and PWVet was evaluated by linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis. There was excellent agreement between PWVet and PWVpp (Pearson's r = 0.94, 95% confidence interval: 0.91-0.96, p < 0.0001; PWVet = 0.88 × PWVpp + 0.57). The Bland-Altman plot revealed an offset of -0.33 m/s with limits of agreement from -2.21 to 1.54 m/s. The coefficients of variation for within-subject repeatability between PWVet and PWVpp had were 5.79% and 8.47%, respectively, without significant differences in the Bland-Altman analysis. The results suggest that echotracking technology can provide a reliable estimate of aortic stiffness comparable to that of the tonometric techniques.
Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Assessed by Ultrasound: A Study with Echotracking Technology
PALOMBO, CARLOCo-primo
;MORIZZO, CARMELA;
2017-01-01
Abstract
Described here is a new method for determination of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) based on arterial diameter waveform recording by an ultrasound system. The study was carried out on 120 consecutive patients. Carotid-femoral PWV was determined using a tonometric technique (PWVpp, PulsePen, DiaTecne, Milan, Italy) and an echotracking ultrasound system (PWVet, E-Track, Aloka, Tokyo, Japan). The relationship between PWVpp and PWVet was evaluated by linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis. There was excellent agreement between PWVet and PWVpp (Pearson's r = 0.94, 95% confidence interval: 0.91-0.96, p < 0.0001; PWVet = 0.88 × PWVpp + 0.57). The Bland-Altman plot revealed an offset of -0.33 m/s with limits of agreement from -2.21 to 1.54 m/s. The coefficients of variation for within-subject repeatability between PWVet and PWVpp had were 5.79% and 8.47%, respectively, without significant differences in the Bland-Altman analysis. The results suggest that echotracking technology can provide a reliable estimate of aortic stiffness comparable to that of the tonometric techniques.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Collette_UMB.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Descrizione: Lavoro originale in extenso
Tipologia:
Versione finale editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
8.36 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
8.36 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.