This paper discusses the usage made by later rhetoricians of the Pāṇinian rule A 2 1 72 showing how its interpretation has been bend in order better fit in the rupaka/ upamā debate. Such an interpretation has deeply influenced also modern interpreters of the rule, thus putting in the background the real focus of the set of rules beginning with 2 1 58 and ending with 72 which are better interpreted as exceptions to or specifications of the determinant / determined rule taught in A 2 1 57.
Cobra e Pavoni. Il ruolo linguistico e retorico di A. 2.1.72
Maria Piera Candotti
;
2017-01-01
Abstract
This paper discusses the usage made by later rhetoricians of the Pāṇinian rule A 2 1 72 showing how its interpretation has been bend in order better fit in the rupaka/ upamā debate. Such an interpretation has deeply influenced also modern interpreters of the rule, thus putting in the background the real focus of the set of rules beginning with 2 1 58 and ending with 72 which are better interpreted as exceptions to or specifications of the determinant / determined rule taught in A 2 1 57.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
