Background: Cystic pancreatic lesions are increasingly found incidentally. The present study compares the robotic assisted surgical approach with the open surgery in the surgical management of cystic lesions of the pancreas, with a view to documenting benefits from the more expensive robotic approach. Methods: From April 2010 to April 2017 37 robotic-assisted left sided pancreatectomy (LSP) for lesion of the body/tail of the pancreas were performed, of which 27 were patients with cystic tumors (RAS-group). Baseline features, surgical outcomes and histopathological examination were compared retrospectively with a group of 27 consecutive patients treated with open surgery for the same indication from May 2005 to April 2010, obtained from the institutional prospectively collected database (OS-Group). Results: The spleen-preserving rate was significantly higher in the RAS group (63% vs. 33.3% in the OS-Group, p<0.05). No difference in the post-operative pancreatic fistula and morbidity was found between the two groups. The median postoperative length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RAS-group: 8 days (range 3-25) vs. 12 days (range 7-26) in the OS-Group (p<0.01). No conversion to open approach was reported in the RAS-group. Conclusion: The robot-assisted LSP is a safe and effective procedure. The robotic approach significantly increases the spleen preservation rate and reduces the post-operative hospital stay. By reducing the trauma of access, it results in smoother post-operative course and faster recovery, particularly important in patients harbouring cystic pancreatic tumors, in increasing their acceptance for surgery when recommended. Prospective studies are necessary to validate the clinical benefits of robotic approach for LSP.

ROBOTIC ASSISTED VERSUS OPEN LEFT PANCREATECTOMY FOR CYSTIC TUMORS: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE

PALMERI M;DI FRANCO G;GUADAGNI S;FURBETTA N;FUNEL N;GIANARDI D;MOGLIA A;GAMBACCINI D;MARCHI S;DI CANDIO G;MOSCA F;MORELLI L
2018

Abstract

Background: Cystic pancreatic lesions are increasingly found incidentally. The present study compares the robotic assisted surgical approach with the open surgery in the surgical management of cystic lesions of the pancreas, with a view to documenting benefits from the more expensive robotic approach. Methods: From April 2010 to April 2017 37 robotic-assisted left sided pancreatectomy (LSP) for lesion of the body/tail of the pancreas were performed, of which 27 were patients with cystic tumors (RAS-group). Baseline features, surgical outcomes and histopathological examination were compared retrospectively with a group of 27 consecutive patients treated with open surgery for the same indication from May 2005 to April 2010, obtained from the institutional prospectively collected database (OS-Group). Results: The spleen-preserving rate was significantly higher in the RAS group (63% vs. 33.3% in the OS-Group, p<0.05). No difference in the post-operative pancreatic fistula and morbidity was found between the two groups. The median postoperative length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RAS-group: 8 days (range 3-25) vs. 12 days (range 7-26) in the OS-Group (p<0.01). No conversion to open approach was reported in the RAS-group. Conclusion: The robot-assisted LSP is a safe and effective procedure. The robotic approach significantly increases the spleen preservation rate and reduces the post-operative hospital stay. By reducing the trauma of access, it results in smoother post-operative course and faster recovery, particularly important in patients harbouring cystic pancreatic tumors, in increasing their acceptance for surgery when recommended. Prospective studies are necessary to validate the clinical benefits of robotic approach for LSP.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11568/935016
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact