In the present paper a multicriteria analysis of a Rankine Pumped Thermal Electricity Storage (PTES) system with low-grade thermal energy integration is performed. The system is composed by an ORC for the discharging phase and a high-temperature heat pump for the charging phase. As previously demonstrated, the low-grade thermal energy can be provided at the heat pump evaporator to boost the PTES performances. As it regards the multi-criteria analysis, a tradeoff is required when electric-to-electric energy ratio ηrt, total exergy exploitation efficiency ψut and energy density ρen, are maximized concurrently. By means of multi-objective optimization, theoretical performances of the system are derived in two different layouts, which are differentiated by the presence, or not, of internal regeneration in charge and discharge subsystems. Results showed that regeneration can be very effective, as it relaxes the tradeoff between the objectives, thus yielding better global performances. Pareto fronts are built and explored to characterize the PTES system. Configurations of interest are proposed, and PTES performances are compared with other storage technologies. Theoretical results showed that, by exploiting thermal energy at temperature lower than 80 °C, ηrt ≈ 0.55 and ρen ≈ 15 kWh/m3 can be concurrently achieved. This can be done at the cost of an inefficient exploitation of the thermal source, as ψut ≈ 0.05. If higher total exergy utilization efficiency is required, storage density can still be maintained high, but ηrt must drop down to 0.4.

Multi-criteria investigation of a pumped thermal electricity storage (PTES) system with thermal integration and sensible heat storage

Frate G. F.;Ferrari L.;Desideri U.
2020-01-01

Abstract

In the present paper a multicriteria analysis of a Rankine Pumped Thermal Electricity Storage (PTES) system with low-grade thermal energy integration is performed. The system is composed by an ORC for the discharging phase and a high-temperature heat pump for the charging phase. As previously demonstrated, the low-grade thermal energy can be provided at the heat pump evaporator to boost the PTES performances. As it regards the multi-criteria analysis, a tradeoff is required when electric-to-electric energy ratio ηrt, total exergy exploitation efficiency ψut and energy density ρen, are maximized concurrently. By means of multi-objective optimization, theoretical performances of the system are derived in two different layouts, which are differentiated by the presence, or not, of internal regeneration in charge and discharge subsystems. Results showed that regeneration can be very effective, as it relaxes the tradeoff between the objectives, thus yielding better global performances. Pareto fronts are built and explored to characterize the PTES system. Configurations of interest are proposed, and PTES performances are compared with other storage technologies. Theoretical results showed that, by exploiting thermal energy at temperature lower than 80 °C, ηrt ≈ 0.55 and ρen ≈ 15 kWh/m3 can be concurrently achieved. This can be done at the cost of an inefficient exploitation of the thermal source, as ψut ≈ 0.05. If higher total exergy utilization efficiency is required, storage density can still be maintained high, but ηrt must drop down to 0.4.
2020
Frate, G. F.; Ferrari, L.; Desideri, U.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0196890420300662-main.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione finale editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 4.95 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.95 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Preprint 1034996.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.94 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.94 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/1034996
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 80
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 63
social impact