Background: Liver metastases (LMs) are related to poor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-containing therapies. In the AtezoTRIBE trial, Immunoscore-Immune-Checkpoint (immunoscore-IC) was a predictor of benefit from atezolizumab in mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients and methods: In pMMR patients enrolled in the AtezoTRIBE study, we investigated the association of LMs with immune-related biomarkers and treatment outcomes, and the predictive role of immunoscore-IC in the LMs group. Results: Out of 202 pMMR patients, 151 (75%) had LMs. No differences in immune-related features were observed according to the presence or not of LMs, except for a lower prevalence of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes-high tumours in the LMs group (33% versus 52%, P = 0.03). Worse outcomes were observed among patients with LMs [progression-free survival (PFS), P = 0.002; overall survival (OS), P = 0.011], also in multivariable models. The effect of adding atezolizumab to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab was independent from LMs in terms of PFS (Pint = 0.990) and OS (Pint = 0.800). Among patients with pMMR mCRC and LMs, those with immunoscore-IC-high but not those with immunoscore-IC-low tumours achieved benefit from atezolizumab, though in the absence of a statistically significant interaction effect (Pint for PFS and OS = 0.166 and 0.473, respectively). Conclusions: LMs are associated with poor prognosis in pMMR mCRC and do not predict resistance to the addition of atezolizumab to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab. Immunoscore-IC seems to retain its predictive impact also among patients with LMs.
Liver metastases do not predict resistance to the addition of atezolizumab to first-line FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab in proficient MMR metastatic colorectal cancer: a secondary analysis of the AtezoTRIBE study
Antoniotti, C;Carullo, M;Rossini, D;Salvatore, L;Lonardi, S;Tamberi, S;Conca, V;Boccaccio, C;Ugolini, C;Cremolini, C
2025-01-01
Abstract
Background: Liver metastases (LMs) are related to poor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-containing therapies. In the AtezoTRIBE trial, Immunoscore-Immune-Checkpoint (immunoscore-IC) was a predictor of benefit from atezolizumab in mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients and methods: In pMMR patients enrolled in the AtezoTRIBE study, we investigated the association of LMs with immune-related biomarkers and treatment outcomes, and the predictive role of immunoscore-IC in the LMs group. Results: Out of 202 pMMR patients, 151 (75%) had LMs. No differences in immune-related features were observed according to the presence or not of LMs, except for a lower prevalence of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes-high tumours in the LMs group (33% versus 52%, P = 0.03). Worse outcomes were observed among patients with LMs [progression-free survival (PFS), P = 0.002; overall survival (OS), P = 0.011], also in multivariable models. The effect of adding atezolizumab to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab was independent from LMs in terms of PFS (Pint = 0.990) and OS (Pint = 0.800). Among patients with pMMR mCRC and LMs, those with immunoscore-IC-high but not those with immunoscore-IC-low tumours achieved benefit from atezolizumab, though in the absence of a statistically significant interaction effect (Pint for PFS and OS = 0.166 and 0.473, respectively). Conclusions: LMs are associated with poor prognosis in pMMR mCRC and do not predict resistance to the addition of atezolizumab to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab. Immunoscore-IC seems to retain its predictive impact also among patients with LMs.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
