OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of a biosynthetic cellulose wound dressing (BWD) to stimulate wound healing in patients with a venous leg ulcer on periulcer skin condition when compared with standard care using a foam dressing. METHODS: Each patient with a venous ulcer received compression therapy with a short stretch bandage system and either a BWD + foam (study group [SG]) or foam (control group [CG]). Periulcer skin condition was compared with the untreated lower leg skin and the forearm skin, using noninvasive parameters, comparing day 0 versus day 28 results. Ulcers were further evaluated for healing rate. The study period was 28 days, and the follow-up period was 12 weeks. Fifty patients were recruited to the study, of which N = 46 (SG, n = 26; CG, n = 20) completed the 28-day study period and were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The BWD showed a more improved periulcer skin condition versus the CG. Transepidermal water loss was significantly less in the SG (P = .003), as well as the results shown with the chromatometer (P = .05). Ulcer healing rate was also statistically significant in favor of the SG (P = .0001). CONCLUSION: Treatment for the BWD + foam group was shown to be safe and significantly improved periwound skin condition, leading to more expeditious wound healing than treatment with foam alone. Copyright © 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Improvement of periulcer skin condition in venous leg ulcer patients: Prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded clinical trial comparing a biosynthetic cellulose dressing with a foam dressing

DINI, VALENTINA;ROMANELLI, MARCO;
2013-01-01

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of a biosynthetic cellulose wound dressing (BWD) to stimulate wound healing in patients with a venous leg ulcer on periulcer skin condition when compared with standard care using a foam dressing. METHODS: Each patient with a venous ulcer received compression therapy with a short stretch bandage system and either a BWD + foam (study group [SG]) or foam (control group [CG]). Periulcer skin condition was compared with the untreated lower leg skin and the forearm skin, using noninvasive parameters, comparing day 0 versus day 28 results. Ulcers were further evaluated for healing rate. The study period was 28 days, and the follow-up period was 12 weeks. Fifty patients were recruited to the study, of which N = 46 (SG, n = 26; CG, n = 20) completed the 28-day study period and were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The BWD showed a more improved periulcer skin condition versus the CG. Transepidermal water loss was significantly less in the SG (P = .003), as well as the results shown with the chromatometer (P = .05). Ulcer healing rate was also statistically significant in favor of the SG (P = .0001). CONCLUSION: Treatment for the BWD + foam group was shown to be safe and significantly improved periwound skin condition, leading to more expeditious wound healing than treatment with foam alone. Copyright © 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
2013
Dini, Valentina; Romanelli, Marco; Andriessen, Anneke; Barbanera, Sabrina; Bertone, Maria Stefania; Brilli, Cinzia; Abel, Martin
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/820374
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact