The importation of fishery products into the European Union (EU) is constantly rising. The aim of this study was to conduct a survey on labeling non-compliances on fishery products imported from extraFuropean countries, in collaboration with the veterinary staff of the Border Inspection Post of Livorno Pisa (BIP), of the Italian Ministry of Health. The correspondence between the products' identity and the scientific denominations reported on the accompanying certificates was checked using the DNA Iparcoding method. Overall, 277 products belonging to different categories (fish, cephalopods, crustaceans, bivalves, amphibian) were submitted to analysis for species identification. The comparison of the molecular results with the scientific names declared on the accompanying documents showed that 22.5% (95%CI 17.8-28.0) of the analyzed products were mislabeled. The highest percentage of mislabeling was observed on cephalopod based products (43.8%, 95% CI 32.3-55.9), followed by crustaceans (17.0%, 95% CI 9.2-29.2) and'fish (14.0%, 95% CI 8.7-21.9). A higher rate was found in products imported from China, Vietnam and Thailand. The present study is the first survey on mislabeling in products sampled at BIPs in Italy. The results highlight the need of implementing analytical checks, based on DNA analysis, on incoming fishery products. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

DNA barcoding as a tool for detecting mislabeling on incoming fishery products from third countries: An official survey conducted at the Border Inspection Post of Livorno-Pisa (Italy)

GUARDONE, LISA;TINACCI, LARA;GUIDI, ALESSANDRA;ARMANI, ANDREA
2017-01-01

Abstract

The importation of fishery products into the European Union (EU) is constantly rising. The aim of this study was to conduct a survey on labeling non-compliances on fishery products imported from extraFuropean countries, in collaboration with the veterinary staff of the Border Inspection Post of Livorno Pisa (BIP), of the Italian Ministry of Health. The correspondence between the products' identity and the scientific denominations reported on the accompanying certificates was checked using the DNA Iparcoding method. Overall, 277 products belonging to different categories (fish, cephalopods, crustaceans, bivalves, amphibian) were submitted to analysis for species identification. The comparison of the molecular results with the scientific names declared on the accompanying documents showed that 22.5% (95%CI 17.8-28.0) of the analyzed products were mislabeled. The highest percentage of mislabeling was observed on cephalopod based products (43.8%, 95% CI 32.3-55.9), followed by crustaceans (17.0%, 95% CI 9.2-29.2) and'fish (14.0%, 95% CI 8.7-21.9). A higher rate was found in products imported from China, Vietnam and Thailand. The present study is the first survey on mislabeling in products sampled at BIPs in Italy. The results highlight the need of implementing analytical checks, based on DNA analysis, on incoming fishery products. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
2017
Guardone, Lisa; Tinacci, Lara; Costanzo, F.; Azzarelli, D.; D'Amico, Priscilla; Tasselli, G.; Magni, A.; Guidi, Alessandra; Nucera, D.; Armani, Andrea
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Guardone,2017.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione finale editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 533.45 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
533.45 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
FOODCONT-S-16-03688 (1).pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.68 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.68 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11568/853864
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 50
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 45
social impact